View Item 
    •   WorldFish Repository Home
    • WorldFish Community
    • Sustainable aquaculture
    • View Item
    •   WorldFish Repository Home
    • WorldFish Community
    • Sustainable aquaculture
    • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/5160

    Typology of interventions for antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture systems in low- and middle-income countries

    Thumbnail

    Abstract
    • Indiscriminate antimicrobial use (AMU) in aquaculture to treat and prevent diseases is common and can lead to the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant micro-organisms, potentially impacting public health and connected ecosystems. This study aimed to develop a typology to classify and characterise interventions to reduce AMU in aquaculture and identify points of action. Seventeen aquaculture and animal health professionals in Asian and African countries were interviewed to gather information on characteristics of interventions in different contexts to develop a typology. Seven types of interventions were defined: (i) legislation and regulations; (ii) industry rules and standards; (iii) voluntary instruments; (iv) commercial technology and alternatives to antimicrobials; (v) on-farm management; (vi) learning and awareness-raising; and (vii) activities with co-benefits. Types were based on intervention function, scope of implementation, implementer, compulsion, strength of the intervention, AMU/antimicrobial resistance (AMR) objective and stakeholder to influence. For each type, examples were described and discussed. The most common interventions to address AMU and AMR were legislative and regulatory frameworks and voluntary instruments, including National Action Plans. Interventions addressing AMU/AMR specifically were scarce. Other interventions focused on indirect effect pathways to AMU and AMR reduction aiming to improve good aquaculture practices, disease prevention and improved management. Monitoring and evaluation of these interventions were found to be rare, only present for interventions driven by development projects and international agencies. The presented typology of existing strategies and interventions addressing AMU/AMR in aquaculture systems can guide evaluation of AMR-sensitive interventions that promote responsible AMU, and informs the design and implementation of future interventions.
    • External link to download this item: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106495
    Collections
    • Sustainable aquaculture [2402]
    View/Open
    • 2022_Paper_Typology_AMR.pdf (1.392Mb)
    Date
    • 2022
    Author
    • Garza, M.
    • Chadag, V.
    • Branton, L.
    • Wieland, B.
    Author(s) ORCID(s)
    • Vishnumurthy Mohan Chadaghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2574-284X
    • Barbara Wielandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-9186
    Subject(s)
    • interventions; antimicrobial use; Fish
    AGROVOC Keywords
    • aquaculture; antimicrobial resistance
    Type
    • Journal Article
    Publisher
    • Elsevier (12 months)
    Metadata
    Show full item record


    Copyright © 2018 WorldFish
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Powered by CodeObia
     

     

    Browse

    All of WorldFish RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2018 WorldFish
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Powered by CodeObia