Show simple item record

dc.creatorHenriksson, P.J.en_US
dc.creatorCucurachi, S.en_US
dc.creatorGuinée, J.B.en_US
dc.creatorHeijungs, R.en_US
dc.creatorTroell, M.en_US
dc.creatorZiegler, F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-09T07:44:07Z
dc.date.available2021-07-09T07:44:07Z
dc.identifier.citationPatrik Henriksson, Stefano Cucurachi, Jeroen Guinée, Reinout Heijungs, Max Troell, Friederike Ziegler. (1/3/2021). A rapid review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of environmental footprints of food commodities and diets. Global Food Security, 28.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2211-9124en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/4784
dc.description.abstractSystematic reviews, sometimes including meta-analyses, are often presented as an approach for identifying healthy and sustainable diets. Here we explore to which extent systematic review protocols have been adopted by studies comparing environmental impacts of foods based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) results, and to which extent they comply with the PRISMA protocol for transparent reporting. Out of 224 studies screened, seven explicitly define themselves as systematic reviews, and/or claim to carry out meta-analyses. Of these, only one acknowledges a review protocol, while none complies with all the PRISMA criteria. Neither do we believe that reviews of LCA results can comply with all the criteria or carry out meta-analyses, due to underreporting on standard deviations and artificial sample sizes in LCAs. Nonetheless, reviews of food commodities and diets based on LCA results would benefit from better aligning with criteria in systematic review protocols.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceGlobal Food Security;28,(2021)en_US
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectdietsen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectfootprinten_US
dc.titleA rapid review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of environmental footprints of food commodities and dietsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.crpFISHen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWorldFishen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationThe University of Tokyoen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Pisa, Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmenten_US
cg.contributor.affiliationStockholm Resilience Centreen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationBeijer Institute of Ecological Economicsen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Environmental Sciences- Leiden Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Econometrics and Operations Research, Vrije Universiteit of Amsterdamen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationRISE Research Institutes of Swedenen_US
cg.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.identifier.ISIindexedISI indexeden_US
cg.description.themeMiscellaneous themesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100508en_US
cg.creator.idPatrik John Gustav Henriksson: 0000-0002-3439-623Xen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record