Show simple item record

dc.creatorHumphries, F.en_US
dc.creatorBenzie, J.en_US
dc.creatorLawson, C.en_US
dc.creatorMorrison, C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T04:13:26Z
dc.date.available2021-12-22T04:13:26Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationHumphries, F. Benzie, J. A. Lawson, C. and Morrison, C. (2021), A review of access and benefit-sharing measures and literature in key aquaculture-producing countries. Rev. Aquacult. 13: 1531-1548. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12532en_US
dc.identifier.issn1753-5123en_US
dc.identifier.issn1753-5131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/5028
dc.description.abstractCountries increasingly use access and benefit-sharing laws as a tool for the conservation and sustainable use of biological resources and associated traditional knowledge. These laws generally require the recipient of resources/knowledge to obtain the provider country’s prior informed consent before collection, use or transfer and to share the benefits from their use with the provider. The aim of this literature review is to comprehensively analyse access and benefit-sharing laws and literature about the top five aquaculture-producing countries – China, India, Indonesia, Viet Nam and Bangladesh – to identify research trends and gaps in relation to accessing and sharing the benefits of aquaculture genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge. Using a systematic quantitative literature review methodology, we found only 5% of the literature examined the implications of access and benefit-sharing for aquaculture and these only related to publications about India’s arrangements. While the other countries had literature about their legal measures and literature about informal genetic resource sharing practices in aquaculture, none of them connected the two research topics. None of the countries had literature analysing the implications of access and benefit-sharing in relation to traditional knowledge associated with aquaculture. We conclude that given these are the top global producers accounting for up to 80% of all aquaculture products, urgent research is needed to fill the literature gaps to assess whether access and benefit-sharing as a legal/policy tool is achieving conservation and sustainable use goals for aquaculture genetic resources.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley (12 months)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en_US
dc.sourceReviews in Aquaculture;13,(2021) Pagination 1531,1548en_US
dc.subjectnagoya protocolen_US
dc.subjectaccess and benefit-sharingen_US
dc.subjectaquaculture genetic resourcesen_US
dc.subjectconvention on biological diversityen_US
dc.subjectFishen_US
dc.titleA review of access and benefit-sharing measures and literature in key aquaculture-producing countriesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.crpFishen_US
cg.contributor.funderEuropean Union, European Commissionen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Fund for Agricultural Developmenten_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.coverage.countryBangladeshen_US
cg.coverage.countryChinaen_US
cg.coverage.countryIndiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryIndonesiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryViet Namen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth-Eastern Asiaen_US
cg.subject.agrovoctraditional knowledgeen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationQueensland University of Technologyen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationGriffith Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWorldFishen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Corken_US
cg.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.identifier.ISIindexedISI indexeden_US
cg.contribution.worldfishauthorBenzie, J.en_US
cg.description.themeSustainable aquacultureen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/raq.12532en_US
cg.creator.idJohn Benzie: 0000-0001-9599-8683en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record