Integrated pest management and aquatic life management: a natural partnership for rice farmers?
| cg.contributor.affiliation | South Asutralian Dept. of Fisheries | |
| cg.description.theme | Miscellaneous themes | en_US |
| cg.identifier.status | Open access | |
| cg.identifier.worldfish | 1388 | |
| cg.subject.agrovoc | agriculture | |
| cg.subject.agrovoc | ecosystems | |
| cg.subject.agrovoc | farmers | |
| cg.subject.agrovoc | management | |
| cg.subject.agrovoc | rice | |
| dc.creator | Horstkotte, G. | |
| dc.creator | Lightfoot, C. | |
| dc.creator | Waibel, H. | |
| dc.creator | Kenmore, P. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-24T05:44:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-24T05:44:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1992 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Over the last decade, Green Revolution rice technology has been subject to increasing criticism. Yields on experiment stations in Southeast Asia not only have declining growth rates, but also the highest yields have been falling steadily. It appears that high inputs of chemical pesticides do not sustain yields and do pollute the environment. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was developed to reduce pesticide usage. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | WF_1388.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.citation | NAGA: the ICLARM Q. 15 (3): 15-17 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/2987 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
| dc.source | NAGA | |
| dc.title | Integrated pest management and aquatic life management: a natural partnership for rice farmers? | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Horstkotte, G. et al. (1992). Integrated pest management and aquatic life management: a natural partnership for rice farmers?. NAGA: the ICLARM Q. 15 (3): 15-17 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
