Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: an analytical framework
cg.contribution.worldfishauthor | Ratner, B. | |
cg.contributor.affiliation | WorldFish | |
cg.contributor.affiliation | IFRPI | |
cg.contributor.affiliation | Colorado State University | |
cg.description.theme | Miscellaneous themes | en_US |
cg.identifier.ISIindexed | ISI indexed | |
cg.identifier.status | Open access | |
cg.identifier.worldfish | 3545 | |
cg.subject.agrovoc | environmental impact assessment | |
cg.subject.agrovoc | governance | |
cg.subject.agrovoc | livelihoods | |
cg.subject.agrovoc | monitoring and evaluation | |
cg.subject.agrovoc | resilience | |
cg.subject.worldfish | natural resource management | |
cg.subject.worldfish | policy | |
cg.subject.worldfish | environmental assessment | |
dc.creator | Ratner, B. | |
dc.creator | Meinzen-Dick, R. | |
dc.creator | May, C. | |
dc.creator | Haglund, E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-20T12:42:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-20T12:42:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.description.abstract | Where access to renewable natural resources essential to rural livelihoods is highly contested, improving cooperation in resource management is an important element in strategies for peacebuilding and conflict prevention. While researchers have made advances in assessing the role of environmental resources as a causal factor in civil conflict, analysis of the positive potential of collective natural resource management efforts to reduce broader conflict is less developed. Addressing this need, we present a framework on collective action, conflict prevention, and social-ecological resilience, linking local stakeholder dynamics to the broader institutional and governance context. Accounting for both formal and informal relationships of power and influence, as well as values and stakeholder perceptions alongside material interests, the framework aims to provide insight into the problem of (re)building legitimacy of common-pool resource management institutions in conflict-sensitive environments. We outline its application in stakeholder-based problem assessment and planning, participatory monitoring and evaluation, and multi-case comparative analysis. | |
dc.description.version | Peer Review | |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier | 3545.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of the Commons, 7(1): 183-208 [open access] | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1875-0281 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/789 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | International Association for the Study of the Commons | |
dc.source | International Journal of the Commons | |
dc.title | Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: an analytical framework | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Ratner, B.D. et al. (2013). Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: an analytical framework. International Journal of the Commons, 7(1): 183-208 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1