Final Evaluation of the FishTrade Project
cg.contributor.affiliation | WorldFish | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | Landell Mills Ltd | en_US |
cg.contributor.crp | Fish | en_US |
cg.contributor.funder | CGIAR System Office | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Botswana | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Burkina Faso | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Burundi | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Cameroon | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Chad | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Democratic Republic of the Congo | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Gabon | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Ghana | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Kenya | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Malawi | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Mali | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Mozambique | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Niger | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Nigeria | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Rwanda | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Senegal | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | United Republic of Tanzania | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Uganda | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Zambia | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | Zimbabwe | en_US |
cg.coverage.region | Southern Africa | en_US |
cg.coverage.region | Western Africa | en_US |
cg.coverage.region | Eastern Africa | en_US |
cg.coverage.region | Middle Africa | en_US |
cg.description.theme | Fisheries | en_US |
cg.description.theme | Aquaculture | en_US |
cg.identifier.status | Open access | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | gender equality | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | sadc countries | en_US |
dc.creator | Keeley, J. | en_US |
dc.creator | Mullett, I. | en_US |
dc.creator | Isaac, H. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-25T10:56:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-25T10:56:40Z | |
dc.description.abstract | This external, independent evaluation assessed results of the European Union-funded Improving food security and reducing poverty through intraregional fish trade in sub-Saharan Africa (FishTrade) project managed by WorldFish, in partnership with the African Union – InterAfrican Bureau for Animal Resources (AU-IBAR) and the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD). The evaluation used the range of methods to triangulate findings in response to a series of evaluation questions organised according to the OECD DAC evaluation criteria and therefore assessed the project’s relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. Finally, the evaluation provided a set of evidence-led, actionable recommendations for future project design and implementation. | en_US |
dc.format | en_US | |
dc.identifier.citation | James Keeley, Imogen Mullett, Hannah Isaac. (31/12/2019). Final Evaluation of the FishTrade Project. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/4090 | |
dc.language | en | en_US |
dc.rights | CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 | en_US |
dc.subject | fisheries and aquaculture | en_US |
dc.subject | partnerships for the goals | en_US |
dc.subject | no poverty | en_US |
dc.subject | zero hunger | en_US |
dc.subject | life below water | en_US |
dc.subject | policy change | en_US |
dc.subject | fish trade | en_US |
dc.subject | Fish | en_US |
dc.title | Final Evaluation of the FishTrade Project | en_US |
dc.type | Internal Report | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
- Name:
- d78e8e519a763bed9912c4cc45cfbdd8.pdf
- Size:
- 1.72 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Final_Evaluation_of_the_FishTrade_Project_Final_Report.pdf
Loading...
- Name:
- 31c1be3c13bf1f2b030c9592308f6ba0.pdf
- Size:
- 1.05 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Final_Evaluation_of_the_FishTrade_Project_Final_Report_Annexes.pdf