Show simple item record

dc.creatorWise, R.M.
dc.creatorFazey, I.
dc.creatorStafford Smith, M.
dc.creatorPark, S.
dc.creatorEakin, H.C.
dc.creatorvan Garderen, E.R.M.A.
dc.creatorCampbell, B.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T08:53:33Z
dc.date.available2018-07-31T08:53:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier3680_2014_Wise_Reconceptualising.pdf
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Environmental Change, [Open Access] Available online 11 January
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/197
dc.description.abstractThe need to adapt to climate change is now widely recognised as evidence of its impacts on social and natural systems grows and greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated. Yet efforts to adapt to climate change, as reported in the literature over the last decade and in selected case studies, have not led to substantial rates of implementation of adaptation actions despite substantial investments in adaptation science. Moreover, implemented actions have been mostly incremental and focused on proximate causes; there are far fewer reports of more systemic or transformative actions. We found that the nature and effectiveness of responses was strongly influenced by framing. Recent decision-oriented approaches that aim to overcome this situation are framed within a "pathways" metaphor to emphasise the need for robust decision making within adaptive processes in the face of uncertainty and inter-temporal complexity. However, to date, such "adaptation pathways" approaches have mostly focused on contexts with clearly identified decision-makers and unambiguous goals; as a result, they generally assume prevailing governance regimes are conducive for adaptation and hence constrain responses to proximate causes of vulnerability. In this paper, we explore a broader conceptualisation of "adaptation pathways" that draws on 'pathways thinking' in the sustainable development domain to consider the implications of path dependency, interactions between adaptation plans, vested interests and global change, and situations where values, interests, or institutions constrain societal responses to change. This re-conceptualisation of adaptation pathways aims to inform decision makers about integrating incremental actions on proximate causes with the transformative aspects of societal change. Case studies illustrate what this might entail. The paper ends with a call for further exploration of theory, methods and procedures to operationalise this broader conceptualisation of adaptation.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceGlobal Environmental Change
dc.titleReconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWise, R.M. et al. (2014). Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change, Available online 11 January
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpAquatic Agricultural Systems
cg.identifier.worldfish3680
cg.subject.agrovocadaptation
cg.subject.agrovocagriculture
cg.subject.agrovocclimate change
cg.subject.agrovocgovernance
cg.subject.worldfishvulnerability
cg.contributor.affiliationCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundee
cg.contributor.affiliationCSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship
cg.contributor.affiliationWorldFish
cg.contributor.affiliationArizona State University
cg.contributor.affiliationNatural Resources and Environment Division
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of the Witwatersrand
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Copenhagen
cg.identifier.statusOpen access
cg.contribution.worldfishauthorPark, S.
cg.description.themeClimate change


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record