Show simple item record

dc.creatorHeijungs, R.
dc.creatorHenriksson, P.J.G.
dc.creatorGuinée, J.B.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-03T06:50:41Z
dc.date.available2018-08-03T06:50:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier4098_2017_Heijungs_Pre-calculated.pdf
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(3): 461 [open access]
dc.identifier.issn0948-3349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/541
dc.description.abstractLetter to the editor: A recent paper by Qin and Suh (2016) provides an interesting test of the assumption of lognormally distributed life cycle inventory (LCI) results. We appreciate the importance of this work, and acknowledge that finding out this result must have taken a long computation time. In that respect, we would like to comment on the remark in section 4 that "conducting uncertainty analysis from the unit process level is neither time-efficient nor necessary for most studies.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
dc.titlePre-calculated LCI systems with uncertainties cannot be used in comparative LCA
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHeijungs, R.; Henriksson, P.J.G.; Guinée, J.B. (2017). Pre-calculated LCI systems with uncertainties cannot be used in comparative LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(3): 461
cg.contributor.crpFISH
cg.identifier.worldfish4098
cg.subject.agrovocsupply chains
cg.contributor.affiliationVrije Universiteit Amsterdam
cg.contributor.affiliationLeiden University
cg.contributor.affiliationStockholm Resilience Centre
cg.contributor.affiliationWorldFish
cg.identifier.statusOpen access
cg.contribution.worldfishauthorHenriksson, P.J.G.
cg.description.themeValue chains and nutrition
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1265-3en_US
cg.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1265-3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record