Show simple item record

dc.creatorDuncan, N.en_US
dc.creatorBond, J.en_US
dc.creatorConallin, J.C.en_US
dc.creatorBaumgartner, L.J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-14T15:19:54Z
dc.date.available2024-01-14T15:19:54Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationNicolette Duncan, Jennifer Bond, John Conallin, Lee Baumgartner. (1/1/2024). How Useful? Fish-Friendly Irrigation Guidelines for the Lower Mekong Lack Definition in Five Key Areas. Environmental Management, 73, pp. 102-114.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0364-152Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn0364-152Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn0364-152Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12348/5762
dc.description.abstractA proliferation of irrigation infrastructure throughout the Mekong River has impacted the ability of certain fish species to migrate to fulfil their lifecycle. In response, fishways, a type of fish-friendly irrigation structure, have been developed to provide passage for these fish. In recent years, several guidelines documents providing guidance on fish-friendly irrigation structures and their construction have been published. The development process from guideline inception to publication is unclear, while their purpose, audience, and contribution to fishway practice are vague. This study is the first to review the development of three fish-friendly guideline documents, using structural criteria analysis, combined with qualitative data from 27 key informant interviews. It aimed to understand document elements such as purpose, audience, scope, and framing. The results showed reviewed guideline utility and impact could be improved by attention to five key aspects, namely: definition of target audience; engagement of target audience in guideline design; definition of guideline scope; specificity of recommendations; and evaluation. Attention to these 5 aspects may result in guidelines that are perceived as more useful by their target audience and have greater impact on water management practice.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceEnvironmental Management;73,(2023) Pagination 102-114en_US
dc.subjectintegrated water managementen_US
dc.subjectmultifunctional irrigationen_US
dc.subjectfishway guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectfish passageen_US
dc.subjectguideline evaluationen_US
dc.titleHow Useful? Fish-Friendly Irrigation Guidelines for the Lower Mekong Lack Definition in Five Key Areasen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.funderAustralian Center for International Agricultural Researchen_US
cg.contributor.funderThe Crawford Funden_US
cg.contributor.funderCharles Stuart University, Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environmenten_US
cg.coverage.countryCambodiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryLao People's Democratic Republicen_US
cg.coverage.countryThailanden_US
cg.coverage.countryViet Namen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth-Eastern Asiaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfishen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWorldFishen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationCharles Sturt Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationCharles Stuart University, Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environmenten_US
cg.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.identifier.ISIindexedISI indexeden_US
cg.description.themeSustainable aquacultureen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01855-4en_US
cg.subject.actionAreaResilient Agrifood Systemsen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaEnvironmental health and biodiversityen_US
cg.contributor.initiativeAquatic Foodsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record